Anyone else losing "faith" in "science"?

Welcome Deep Dives Social Engineering Anyone else losing "faith" in "science"?

Viewing 7 reply threads
    • #29344

      Monica Perez
      Keymaster

      I defo think they are related in that the same jerks who are constantly spewing stuff in the sky are triggering catastrophes only the technocracy can save us from!

    • #29353

      Byron
      Participant

      Interesting wording in the article:

      • “link”—This word has become INCREDIBLY prevalent in all manner of articles that have a goal of convincing readers to arrive at a conclusion that is unproven.  We definitely see this in articles proclaiming nearly every food and drink known to man being somehow “linked to cancer”.
      • “consensus” – It’s been quite a long time since I’ve studied the scientific method, but I don’t recall “consensus” being a requisite step.  Perhaps things have changed.  Perhaps there is a global scientist Survey Monkey e-mail list where they vote any manner of topics that then become “science”.
    • #29355

      Monica Perez
      Keymaster

      And no one ever talks about tests like these or in the stratosphere being responsible for the hole in the ozone or other such phenomena

    • #29359

      Galactus
      Participant

      In science? No. In people who claim to be scientists? Long time ago. People seem to liken scientists as a sub group of humans that are above lying, having agendas and distorting the truth for personal gain. Could do multiple shows on scientists caught fudging climate “science” and other things.

      • #29559

        Jack of Herts
        Participant

        Spot on. Real science demands proof, many scientists today don’t follow the scientific method, they follow any path that gives them funding

    • #29366

      Monica Perez
      Keymaster

      Ha! Yes … like it’s subset, doctors, in whom we entrust the lives of those we cherish most from the moment our babies are born (before!) until the moment our parents die prolonged deaths …they literally cut our babies on purpose the second they are born & soon after slice open their veins to insert pathogenic dna & anyone who questions them demonized – can’t even sue for any harm done!

      I don’t usually rant but I detest the exaltation of humans – the awe that greets people of status …the state of things should have us a bit wiser than to revere those responsible for it

    • #29708

      Kathleen King
      Participant

      OMG. Science is…..playing with the environment without telling anyone or providing the public with notice of the intent and studies (by scientific method) to verify the safety. I knew of the solar management but didn’t pay much attention until the other day 10/28/19. I was at a shopping area and had a large unobstructed view of a beautiful clear blue October sky as I went into the store. When I came out, there were several jets crisscrossing the sky and leaving trails as far as I could see. I watched for over 20 minutes as the sky became completely obscured by their trails and it became a very cloudy day. This really shocked me as I had never seen such blatant use of the trails to change the sky. I don’t know whether they were trying to create the forecast rainy Halloween or prevent it or some other nefarious plan. Wow. I am a believer now.

      • #29745

        Monica Perez
        Keymaster

        It took me SO long to see what was happening up there – I just couldn’t see it for some reason – but once I did, I can’t unsee it…it’s what upsets me most in my day to day…i almost wonder if a sick bonus for these people is that it makes people who really see it look (and maybe even sometimes feel) crazy! it’s so blatant too! look out for this little trick ive seen a few times…massive illegible “sky writing” – there must be something that requires a pattern that cant be attributed to normal flight paths…it’s maddening…

    • #29756

      Byron
      Participant

      34 of the most dangerous things science has strongly linked to cancer

      Spoiler alert:  “Sugar” is at the top of the list.

    • #29761

      So, I think this is just a pattern of power. First, the government steps into an industry seen as “powerful” within our society: medical, legal, financial, etc. Then they require licensing. They take your right to do something and sell it back to you, and they make it difficult enough to ensure that only the privileged few can enter certain ranks. They do this in the interest of “public good” and of course everyone then says that this is reasonable. I mean, you wouldn’t let just anyone perform surgery on you?! RIGHT?!

      After a time, people will forget that things were ever any other way, and when bad things do happen they will argue that it would naturally be worse without the government but that nothing is perfect and so we must just accept that sometimes the system fails us.

      “Science” has entered this arena by other means. The State has created a research industrial complex through which they can control a decent percentage of “scientific” voices. They can, through appeals to authority/majority, now reliably control any narrative that even tangentially approaches the “Scientific community.” This started, as far as I can tell, with Tech. The State started recruiting young minds from Stanford in Palo Alto for various intelligence programs and technology programs during the Cold War. This eventually created many of the “Big Tech” companies of today: Oracle, Google, etc. This process, naturally, didn’t stop. There was LifeLog, which given its supposed end of life, I suspect was turned into Facebook. The research scientists at labs in Stanford, UC Berkley, LLNL, etc are still funded by the State. At this point, any research done at a major University or megacorp that is not expressly against the State should, imho, be treated as governmental.

Viewing 7 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.